# DeepSeek Harness vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 56 870 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 ✓ | +141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 82/100 for Typst, so it is the safer default.

Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-typst