# DeepSeek Harness vs Trinity

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Trinity |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 ✓ | 711 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.

Trinity ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Trinity](https://selfhost.directory/project/trinity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trinity.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-trinity