# DeepSeek Harness vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 265 481 ✓ | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 489 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-transcriber