# DeepSeek Harness vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 471 ✓ | 117 655 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 479 ✓ | +5 296 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-tradingagents