# DeepSeek Harness vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 264 755 ✓ | 47 723 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 763 ✓ | +23 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 763 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-text-generation-webui