# DeepSeek Harness vs swarm-cronjob

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | swarm-cronjob |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 ✓ | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.

swarm-cronjob ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [swarm-cronjob](https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-swarm-cronjob