# DeepSeek Harness vs Super Productivity

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Super Productivity |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 264 755 ✓ | 23 228 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 763 ✓ | +1 007 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 83/100 for Super Productivity, so it is the safer default.

Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 763 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Super Productivity](https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/super-productivity.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-super-productivity