# DeepSeek Harness vs static_status

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | static_status |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [static_status](https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/static-status.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-static-status