# DeepSeek Harness vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 264 906 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 914 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana