# DeepSeek Harness vs Speakr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 4 135 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 ✓ | +135 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 63/100 for Speakr, so it is the safer default.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Speakr](https://selfhost.directory/project/speakr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speakr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-speakr