# DeepSeek Harness vs Sonarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Sonarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 264 906 ✓ | 17 478 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 914 ✓ | +965 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 81/100 for Sonarr, so it is the safer default.

Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Sonarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-sonarr