# DeepSeek Harness vs SeaGOAT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | SeaGOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 6 in Code Management |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 ✓ | 1 316 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 53/100 for SeaGOAT, so it is the safer default.

SeaGOAT ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaGOAT is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [SeaGOAT](https://selfhost.directory/project/seagoat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seagoat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-seagoat