# DeepSeek Harness vs ScreenTinker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | ScreenTinker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 264 906 ✓ | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 914 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.

ScreenTinker ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [ScreenTinker](https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-screentinker