# DeepSeek Harness vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-scada-lts