# DeepSeek Harness vs sandboxed.sh

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | sandboxed.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 676 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 ✓ | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-sandboxedsh