# DeepSeek Harness vs rsspush

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | rsspush |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 4 in RSS |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 ✓ | 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | — |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 42/100 for rsspush, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, rsspush is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [rsspush](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsspush) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsspush.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-rsspush