# DeepSeek Harness vs R2R

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | R2R |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 ✓ | 8 048 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-r2r