# DeepSeek Harness vs QMReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | QMReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 264 906 ✓ | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 914 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.

QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [QMReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-qmreader