# DeepSeek Harness vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-qm-music