# DeepSeek Harness vs QA-Pilot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | QA-Pilot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #55 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 264 755 ✓ | 329 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 763 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Svelte |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 40/100 for QA-Pilot, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; QA-Pilot needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 763 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [QA-Pilot](https://selfhost.directory/project/qa-pilot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qa-pilot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-qa-pilot