# DeepSeek Harness vs ProxmoxMCP-Plus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | ProxmoxMCP-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 ✓ | 624 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 54/100 for ProxmoxMCP-Plus, so it is the safer default.

ProxmoxMCP-Plus ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [ProxmoxMCP-Plus](https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmoxmcp-plus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proxmoxmcp-plus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-proxmoxmcp-plus