# DeepSeek Harness vs ProductFlow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | ProductFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #71 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 ✓ | 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.1.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 44/100 for ProductFlow, so it is the safer default.

ProductFlow ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [ProductFlow](https://selfhost.directory/project/productflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/productflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-productflow