# DeepSeek Harness vs portchecker.io

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | portchecker.io |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #16 of 20 in Network Utilities |
| GitHub stars | 265 409 ✓ | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 417 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.2.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 47/100 for portchecker.io, so it is the safer default.

portchecker.io ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, portchecker.io is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 417 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [portchecker.io](https://selfhost.directory/project/portcheckerio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portcheckerio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-portcheckerio