# DeepSeek Harness vs PanWatch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | PanWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 ✓ | 2 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 ✓ | +118 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.

PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [PanWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-panwatch