# DeepSeek Harness vs pandaprobe

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | pandaprobe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #43 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 265 723 ✓ | 792 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 731 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.0 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 51/100 for pandaprobe, so it is the safer default.

pandaprobe ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 731 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [pandaprobe](https://selfhost.directory/project/pandaprobe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pandaprobe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-pandaprobe