# DeepSeek Harness vs PaddleOCR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | PaddleOCR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 265 481 ✓ | 91 931 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 489 ✓ | +490 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 85/100 for PaddleOCR, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paddleocr