# DeepSeek Harness vs OSEM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | OSEM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 11 in Event Management |
| GitHub stars | 265 570 ✓ | 929 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 578 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; OSEM needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 578 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [OSEM](https://selfhost.directory/project/osem) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/osem.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-osem