# DeepSeek Harness vs Operant

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Operant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 906 ✓ | 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 914 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.

Operant ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Operant needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Operant](https://selfhost.directory/project/operant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/operant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-operant