# DeepSeek Harness vs openobserve

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | openobserve |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 ✓ | 22 565 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 ✓ | +448 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.1.2 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 78/100 for openobserve, so it is the safer default.

openobserve ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [openobserve](https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openobserve.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-openobserve