# DeepSeek Harness vs openHop Repeater

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | openHop Repeater |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.

openHop Repeater ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [openHop Repeater](https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-openhop-repeater