# DeepSeek Harness vs openclaw-command-center

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | openclaw-command-center |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #110 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 ✓ | 248 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.1 · 8 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 48/100 for openclaw-command-center, so it is the safer default.

openclaw-command-center ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw-command-center is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [openclaw-command-center](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw-command-center) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw-command-center.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-openclaw-command-center