# DeepSeek Harness vs OpenDesign

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | OpenDesign |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 7 in Design |
| GitHub stars | 264 906 ✓ | 104 656 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 914 ✓ | +1 825 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | open-design-v0.26.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 83/100 for OpenDesign, so it is the safer default.

OpenDesign ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [OpenDesign](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-design) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-design.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-open-design