# DeepSeek Harness vs Omoide

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Omoide |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #37 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 265 570 ✓ | 277 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 578 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.6 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 40/100 for Omoide, so it is the safer default.

Omoide ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 578 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Omoide](https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-omoide