# DeepSeek Harness vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 93 190 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 | +57 916 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 87/100 for DeepSeek Harness, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 916 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-omnivoice-studio