# DeepSeek Harness vs Obscura

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Obscura |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 ✓ | 29 526 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 ✓ | +442 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.2.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Obscura, so it is the safer default.

Obscura ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, Obscura is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Obscura](https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/obscura.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-obscura