# DeepSeek Harness vs monitorss-bot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | monitorss-bot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 4 in RSS |
| GitHub stars | 264 906 ✓ | 1 296 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 914 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 58/100 for monitorss-bot, so it is the safer default.

monitorss-bot ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; monitorss-bot needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [monitorss-bot](https://selfhost.directory/project/monitorss-bot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/monitorss-bot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-monitorss-bot