# DeepSeek Harness vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 ✓ | 46 462 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 ✓ | +1 327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 86/100 for mitmproxy, so it is the safer default.

mitmproxy ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-mitmproxy