# DeepSeek Harness vs MikroDash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | MikroDash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 265 481 ✓ | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 489 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

MikroDash ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 489 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-mikrodash