# DeepSeek Harness vs microclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | microclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #30 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 ✓ | 749 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.11.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 52/100 for microclaw, so it is the safer default.

microclaw ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [microclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/microclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/microclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-microclaw