# DeepSeek Harness vs metamcp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | metamcp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 2 735 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 ✓ | +49 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

metamcp ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-metamcp