# DeepSeek Harness vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 265 570 ✓ | 132 728 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 578 ✓ | +3 273 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1468 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | b11982 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 87/100 for DeepSeek Harness, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1468 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 578 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-llamacpp