# DeepSeek Harness vs Libation

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | Libation |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 264 755 ✓ | 6 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 763 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 763 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-libation