# DeepSeek Harness vs InvokeAI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | InvokeAI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 ✓ | 28 903 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 ✓ | +623 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 82/100 for InvokeAI, so it is the safer default.

InvokeAI ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [InvokeAI](https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/invokeai.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-invokeai