# DeepSeek Harness vs HiClaw

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | HiClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 377 ✓ | 5 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 385 ✓ | +222 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 385 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-hiclaw