# DeepSeek Harness vs gramps-web

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | gramps-web |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 5 in Research |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 1 784 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 ✓ | +87 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v26.10.2 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 66/100 for gramps-web, so it is the safer default.

gramps-web ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [gramps-web](https://selfhost.directory/project/gramps-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gramps-web.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-gramps-web