# DeepSeek Harness vs gramps-web-api

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | gramps-web-api |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 5 in Research |
| GitHub stars | 265 285 ✓ | 229 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 293 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.25.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 52/100 for gramps-web-api, so it is the safer default.

gramps-web-api ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 293 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [gramps-web-api](https://selfhost.directory/project/gramps-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gramps-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-gramps-web-api