# DeepSeek Harness vs GPTPortal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | GPTPortal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #28 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 ✓ | 396 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 50/100 for GPTPortal, so it is the safer default.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [GPTPortal](https://selfhost.directory/project/gptportal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gptportal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-gptportal