# DeepSeek Harness vs fuseai

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | fuseai |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #59 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 ✓ | 291 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 37/100 for fuseai, so it is the safer default.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [fuseai](https://selfhost.directory/project/fuseai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fuseai.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-fuseai