# DeepSeek Harness vs FreeSWITCH

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | FreeSWITCH |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 16 in VoIP |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 ✓ | 5 263 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 ✓ | +80 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.11.3 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 69/100 for FreeSWITCH, so it is the safer default.

FreeSWITCH ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; FreeSWITCH needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [FreeSWITCH](https://selfhost.directory/project/freeswitch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/freeswitch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-freeswitch