# DeepSeek Harness vs docker-pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DeepSeek Harness | docker-pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 ✓ | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 ✓ | 11 728 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 ✓ | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)
- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-docker-pi-hole